![]() |
![]() |
|
The day I visited Bauhaus Books and Coffee was a day of sun breaks, those glaringly bright phenomena that fortunately aren't very common in Seattle in the winter. That's why I chose to go exploring in the late afternoon, when the shadows are diffuse and the colors sharpen. It's a great time for photography, romance, striking dramatic poses, and drinking cappuccino. For being on a southeast corner -- i.e. with north- and west-facing windows -- Bauhaus is certainly a bright place in the late afternoon. But what a wonderfully congenial place it is. When I first walked in there was a mere scattering of patrons; after another half hour the place had fleshed out to a moderate crowd, the vintage Bowie on the sound system setting the mood; I felt almost as if I were at a party. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Bauhaus is a two-level coffeehouse with a collection of used books on art, architecture, film, and literature covering one wall. There is a scattering of tables downstairs, a loft full of tables at the top of the stairs, and a skinny sunlit room which suggests an enclosed porch on the west side. At first I opted for a nicely closeted booth in this area; but that damn winter sun which was about to sink into the southwest shone directly in my eyes. And if you know ol' photosensitive me, you know this is a JC no-no! So I grabbed the last place left in the main room, just enough in the shade -- although my table was awash with the sun's grand finale for several minutes. My double short cappuccino was...well, it was -- how do I say this? -- surprisingly good! I really wasn't expecting such fine, robust, and absolutely fascinating shots from a bookstore-cafe hybrid like Bauhaus. The drink was served in the standard white coffee cup. The foam was beautiful and luxurious, if a bit overly abundant -- as well as wasted, since I couldn't find a clean spoon and the place was full of people, so I hesitated to use my fingers. But what was it about the espresso itself? I don't know what kind of coffee they're using; I assume it's their own, or at least their own special blend prepared by another roaster. It tastes almost as if it has brandy or something in it. Yes, that's the taste I'm thinking of! |
|
|
(In case you've never tried it, an excellent cappuccino can be turned into an exquisite delight by adding a shot of brandy or cognac. It's called a caffe corretto. Try it some time!) Now that I look around, the reason there's so much light in Bauhaus is because of the building itself. The Melrose Building is one of those wonderful old structures with skyscraping windows that line East Pine and East Pike. It's very much like the building the Elysian Brewpub is in -- which, by the way, makes the best beer in Seattle, not to mention a heavenly eggplant parmesan sandwich; but that's a subject to be covered in some future beer and food column. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Speaking of food, Bauhaus seems like a perfect spot to start the day. With all these windows and this light, along with a decent dose of good-tasting caffeine, who wouldn't become fired up for whatever the day promises? I'm not sure if Bauhaus serves any sort of food beyond scones or muffins, but there's nothing wrong with a continental breakfast now and then. Speaking of breakfast -- which I strongly believe is the most important meal of the day -- there was a story last spring about a woman who sued a pharmacy for half a million after she bought a tube of their contraceptive jelly, spread it on toast, ate it, and got pregnant anyway. Apparently she was too busy -- and, obviously, too stupid -- to read the directions on the tube. The woman, a former model and cheerleader, insisted that nobody "has time to sit around reading directions these days, especially when [they're] sexually aroused." I don't know about you, but the last thing I want to do when I'm sexually aroused is go in the kitchen and make toast. I never heard the final outcome of this lawsuit, but I'm voting for the pharmacy myself. |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
And after she sets the table with the fancy sanitary napkins, she can prepare the Molotov cocktails and put on some mood music: perhaps pop some dental tape into the tape deck, or maybe one of her 12-month matured CDs into the CD player. And if her date never shows up and she grows too despondent, she can always check into the nearest roach motel and blow her brains out with a glue gun. |
|
On the subject of breakfast, here's some e-mail with my Bay Area friend -- spread over the course of a few months last year -- concerning cereal boxes:
|
DATE: 7/12/97 This morning I found it nearly impossible to rip the bag open on the new box of Nature's Path Millet Rice. I've gotten used to having my 35% Fruit Muesli spew all over the kitchen every time I attempt to gently open a new bag, but I've never had this trouble with the Millet Rice before. I tugged at it and tugged at it until I'd rubbed the skin off my knuckles. Then I offered it to Max, who tugged and tugged and pronounced it impossible to pull open. So he grabbed a sharp knife and, with the hands of a surgeon, very carefully sliced into the top seam of the bag... So how many times have you tried to pull open a new bag just to have it rip completely down, so that you have to pour the contents into a new unripped bag? Doesn't this defeat the concept of the bag in the first place? Isn't it there for our protection and the product's freshness, and not just as something to throw away as soon as we open it? It doesn't make any sense. Why do they make so many childproof food packages? Is it because such a large percentage of American children are obese? Shouldn't us thin people have the option of purchasing non-childproof cereal boxes? |
|
DATE: 7/12/97 12:26 PM And speaking of unopenable packaging, were CD cases designed with the intent that, if stolen, the thief would be unable to get to the disc? Under the shrink wrap many of them appear to have a pull-strip, but I have only been able to dislodge about one in ten with fingernails alone. (I have resorted to carrying a utility knife to deal with all shrink-wrapped items.) Then there is the adhesive seal along the top edge, which always separates into at least three shreds and remains affixed to my fingers, impossible to dispose of. Finally, some CDs seem permanently affixed to the plastic hub and flex until they threaten to break in two without releasing. On one I resorted to prying the tabs with my fingers; thereafter the hub would no longer hold the disc. Oh, and the little booklet wedged between plastic tabs in the front of the case. If I'm lucky, I can release all but the first page or two without using a surgical instrument. How do the children of today, with their limited attention spans, find the patience to open a CD? |
|
DATE: 8/21/97 11:06 AM |
|
DATE: 8/21/97 12:26 PM I noticed that the box of Heritage cereal says that the Natures Path people would be happy to hear our comments. But they have no 800 number, and they're in Canada, so you'd have to pay extra postage. |
|
DATE: 8/22/97 11:06 AM We've since changed to Tidy Cat, which is a hell of a lot cheaper and just as good. Unfortunately the 20-pound bags of Tidy Cat are glued -- or, I suppose, welded -- shut. It takes a good deal of tearing, pawing, prying, ripping, and cussing to get a bag open, and then you have to hoist the damn thing up, trying hard not to pour the contents all over the floor. It's a tough world out there -- tough to open, anyway. So why do packaged products come sealed for eternity, impervious to those prying hands of consumers, when truckloads of plywood boards and drywall panels roar down the highway with barely anything to restrain them? How many times have you found yourself nervously tailing a 2000-pound wobbling wall of lumber which threatens to unload itself on your windshield while you struggle to open a small package of antacids which are sealed like a Chinese puzzle box? |
|
DATE: 10/16/97 11:06 AM So we have an easier breakfasttime to look forward to -- and fewer cereal flakes on the kitchen floor. Surprisingly there was nothing else in the letter but the letter itself. When I wrote to the M&Ms Company back in the 1970s asking if they were ever going to use red dyes again, they replied with a letter and a coupon for a free large bag of M&Ms. When I wrote to Starkist around the same time about a can of Nine Lives Catfood that seemed emptier than usual, they replied with a letter and several coupons for free cans of Nine Lives. When I wrote to Maxell in the early 1980s, enclosing a cassette tape which my car stereo had eaten, they sent me a new tape and a coupon for some free tapes. When I wrote to CalTrans in the late 1980s asking them about the renaming of Route 11 in Los Angeles to Route 110, they replied with a letter and --wait a minute, they didn't send me a coupon for anything! (But if they'd been using their heads they would have enclosed a certificate good for a free tank of gas. Or at least a bag of cement.) So what's the point in writing letters to manufacturers of products if they don't reward you for the effort? I feel like a salivating dog with nothing to salivate about. |
|
DATE:10/16/97 12:26 PM I found that the most thankless people of all must be publishing companies. When I read new paperback editions of Les Miserables and Faulkner's The Hamlet about ten years ago I found several dozen typographical errors in the text, in one case with an entire line misplaced on the page. I painstakingly logged them, typed them up, and sent them to the publisher (two different companies) and never received even one word of acknowledgment. |
| For more on Nature's Path, read this update |
Some related links:
![]() |
![]() |
|
© 1998 JC Mitchell |